Michael, whats the status of getting this fixed? Having 5+ false-positives from CI per day is a great way to get people to ignore CI altogether.
Is this something that you are looking into, someone else is looking into, or is it something that we should find someone to look into? Ben On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Saptarshi Purkayastha <[email protected]> wrote: > Apologies for the failure emails from bamboo > Happening again... Bamboo doesn't seem to like me... It built fine for > wyclif's commit that happened between my failure commits!! :P > > --- > Regards, > Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA > > My Tech Blog: http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com > You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE > > > On 26 August 2011 19:48, Michael Downey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Saptarshi, >> >> On Friday, August 26, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote: >> >> Check if the server is loosing time and has the NTP running where on the >> update there is a big time difference and JVM exits. The easy solutions is >> to shutdown NTP and let it give wrong timestamps or better if server >> hardware needs to be fixed. >> >> What would you consider a "big" difference? I don't see any substantial >> (more than maybe a second or two?) drift happening. >> That said, I changed the trunk project in Bamboo to run mvn with -e so we >> can get some additional logging. Of course as fate would have it, things ran >> fine when I tried to re-run it with more logging. We will watch for the next >> failure and investigate further. >> -Michael > > ________________________________ > Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
