+1 for 1.7 Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 19:27 William Colen <william.co...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> +1 for 1.7 > > William > > 2016-11-07 16:22 GMT-02:00 Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com>: > > > I am also in favor of 1.7. > > > > Jörn > > > > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 18:01 +0000, Russ, Daniel (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote: > > > Also the lemmatizer has significantly changed. I vote 1.7 > > > > > > On 11/7/16, 12:59 PM, "Joern Kottmann" <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > since our last release it has been a while and we received quite > > > a few > > > changes which would be nice to get released. > > > > > > There are still some open Jira issues, but mostly smaller things > > > that > > > can be wrapped up rather quickly. > > > > > > Is there anything important missing which should go into the next > > > release? Otherwise I think we should also aim for more frequent > > > released and just make one again early next year, with all the > > > stuff we > > > might miss out now. > > > > > > We took in a patch - as part of OPENNLP-830 - to replace our > > > self-made > > > hash table with the java.util.HashMap. This change is not > > > backward > > > compatible for folks who extend AbstractModel. > > > > > > Should we go with 1.6.1 as a next version or should we make 1.7.0 > > > to > > > reflect that? > > > > > > Previously we only had backward incompatible changes in versions > > > which > > > bumped by the second number. Maybe that is better choice. It will > > > probably break some peoples code when they update. > > > > > > We also have lots of deprecated API still in OpenNLP, should we > > > try to > > > remove as much as possible of it now? > > > > > > Jörn > > > > > > > > >
