Sorry for the flyby comment...

What’s the status of the models? Are they being treated like convenience 
binaries or are they a source release artifact?

I ask because it’s relevant to what the vote is about, the process, and the 
options for distribution.

-joey

> On Mar 15, 2021, at 2:22 PM, Jeff Zemerick <jzemer...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Richard, thanks for your feedback. That is all very important and I
> apologize for overlooking those things. And as a first release it's
> important we capture and document those steps to make future releases
> easier.
> 
> Thanks to those who voted but we'll cancel this vote and try again soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 3:00 AM Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12. Mar 2021, at 14:39, Jeff Zemerick <jzemer...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This vote is to release the models as version 1.0. (The models are still
>>> available in the Dropbox folder at
>>> 
>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p8focuz0qwvw84b/AAC6GqO8mqZn_xkAqHZsVAsoa?dl=0&lst=
>>> along with text files showing the training and evaluation results).
>> 
>> As far as I can see, the files are not signed and cannot be validated for
>> authenticity.
>> There are no release notes, no information where the files come from, no
>> license
>> information, etc. The files are also no on ASF systems (cf.
>> https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html).
>> 
>> I don't see how in this situation a release vote according to ASF
>> standards is possible. That is
>> a vote that:
>> 
>>> A binding release vote of the PMC is the critical gating step in the
>> release process. Without such a vote, the release is just a set of files
>> prepared by an individual. After such a vote, it is a formal offering of
>> the ASF, backed by the "full faith and credit" of the Foundation.
>> 
>> However, the voting thread "looks" official - so it looks like you aim for
>> such a proper release.
>> 
>> I do not think the process should continue as is and should either be
>> restarted properly or
>> not take the appearance of being an official release process.
>> 
>> -1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -- Richard
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to