On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi Detlef, > > thanks for sharing this informative report and thanks for representing > AOO on the Linuxday. > > The report is good and the outcome is that users welcome that OpenOfifce > is still alive and found a new home under the ASF. But it also shows > that many, many user are confused and don't really understand the > difference between AOO and LO.
Well, the truth is that many, many users don't even know what LO is (that is, our Windows user base). Of course, this was a Linux event, where people have by default LO installed; what most Linux users don't know is that they never had a vanilla OpenOffice.org in their Linux distribution, but the go-oo fork, only named OpenOffice.org (what shows the complete previous failure of the fork in building a brand). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgp0Ff5tey3IH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
