Messages by Thread
-
[PR] java: replace obsolete dependencies on xml-apis and Xerces. [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Anyone working on the gcc-freebsd-aarch64 CPP bridge ?
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
MacOS Silicon build from trunk
Petko
-
Raising the Java version to 11
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
Call for Volunteers - AOO 4.1.17
Jim Jagielski
-
blog post on the development plans
Petko
-
[PR] Remove StAX from the build. [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] solver: Initial/current Calc solution [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
next testbuild AOO about saving files.
Petko
-
[PR] Win10 msvc trunk [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] Fix non-system build of Python 3 on Linux [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] calc/solver: Update error reporting for CoinMP [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
compile trunk with modern windows build tools
Petko
-
Jim OOO Aug 21-29
Jim Jagielski
-
1st build with 2019 compiler
Petko
-
ICU 4.8.1 in IBM's Symphony
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
[PR] Report wizard start failures instead of failing silently (bz-80338) [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Release targets for AOO
Petko
-
Ineed to take a break
Matthias Seidel
-
license for graphics?
Matthias Seidel
-
my absence
Matthias Seidel
-
[PR] Update Capitalise.py [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
issues with heritage and modern compilers
Petko
-
[DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Dave Fisher
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Petko
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Pedro Lino via dev
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Pedro Lino via dev
-
[DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X (Was: Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?_
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X (Was: Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?_
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X
Arrigo Marchiori
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X
Marcus
-
Trunk is AOO 5.1.x, and welcome to new branch AOO50X
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X (Was: Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?_
Petko
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Rory O'Farrell
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Marcus
-
Claude Max for Opensource
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
Re: [Issue 126990] File saved normally then opened and filled with #
Rory O'Farrell
-
Remaining windows-amd64 patches merged to trunk
Damjan Jovanovic
-
OpenOffice 4.1.16 on (X)ubuntu 26.04
Rory O'Farrell
-
PR merge issues with the pre hooks intsalled.
Peter Kovacs
-
[PR] Bz126990 file corruption at shutdown trunk [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Matthias Seidel
-
Win32/Win64 build issues on trunk
Damjan Jovanovic
-
[PR] Win64 bridge backport [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Open Office and Macs-- solution ?
Jeffery Scott
-
Win64 build issue
Petko
-
[PR] Bugfix dxf filter [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] Fix building Python3 on linux [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
aoo behaviour on linked files
Petko