Submitted as enhancement to BZ ([1]). I'll ignore the test case on TestLink.
Lucas [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121459 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Lucas Burson <ljdeli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we remove the test from TestLink or should I just mark it as failed? > Since it isn't implemented it doesn't make much sense to have it as a > regression test. > On Dec 9, 2012 11:50 PM, "Zhang Lu" <zhanglu....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Zhu shen, >> Sure, it can be implemented as a feature due to workload, thanks! >> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Shan Zhu <shanzh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, Lu >> > It's okay. IMHO, it can be implemented as a feature enhancement. Then >> > prepare a formal testing to verify this implementation. It will be >> better >> > than checking it as defect verification. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Shan Zhu >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Zhang Lu <zhanglu....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, Lucas and Shan >> > > >> > > There is no code for checking the validation of input value as Zhu >> > Shan >> > > said, I have got through this part code, not only whole numbers, but >> also >> > > all other categories existed this issue. So I think it can be handled >> as >> > a >> > > defect. If user input an illegal value, there is meaningless for data >> > > validation. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Lu Zhang >> > > >> > >> >
