Quite a large number, congrats to all those that made it happen !

@rob: did you check up on wiki and google analytics ?
we switch to a new vm in a couple of days, but that should not influence
it...but once we do it would be nice to have it controlled again.

rgds
Jan I.


On 8 January 2013 20:13, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Roberto Galoppini <rgalopp...@geek.net>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
> wrote:
> >> > Am 12/31/2012 08:00 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> >> >
> >> >> The download count on main D/L page ought be updated to show the 30+
> >> >> million.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I've done the update.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Thanks.  And I've updated the charts now:
> >> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html
> >>
> >> The final count for 2012 was:  30,687,795 downloads.
> >>
> >
> > Actually we missed to compute download logs from Dec 23, 24 and Jan 2.
> > We've worked out a plan for reconstituting them all and we did it as of
> > yesterday. If you could kindly recompute your graphs you'll see a bit
> more
> > downloads for 2012.
> >
> > Sorry for the inconvenience it might have caused to you.
> >
>
> No problem.  We want to have the most accurate numbers possible, so
> this is good.  I've updated the charts.
>
> So the new count for the year end figure is:  30,963,581
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> >> I predict we will more than double this in 2013, due to:
> >>
> >> 1) Being able to count downloads for the full year.  (AOO 3.4 was not
> >> available until May in 2012 and I did not include OOo 3.3.0 download
> >> in the counts.)
> >>
> >> 2) Greater language coverage, starting very soon with the release of
> >> more 3.4.1 languages, and even more with 4.0.
> >>
> >> 3) Exciting new features in AOO 4.0
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> > Marcus
> >>
> >
> > --
> > ====
> > This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above.
> It
> > may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
> > intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> > distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
> > notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and
> any
> > attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
> >
>

Reply via email to