On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<[email protected]> wrote:
> My impression is that addition of issues@ o.a.o to the CC list is automatic.  
> But maybe that is only for new issues since the move to Apache bugzilla.  In 
> that case, it makes sense to clean up old ones that way.
>

Exactly.  Every "product" has one or more "components".  For example,
the spreadsheet product has the following components:

code
configuration
editing
formatting
open-import
printing
programming
save-export
ui

And each component then has "default assignee" and a "default cc
list".  We have them both set to "[email protected]" for
all products and components.  But the legacy project did fine-grained
default assignments to various product-specific mailing lists.

The "default assignee" field must be set.  But the "default cc list"
is optional.

-Rob
>  - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 08:26
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Assigning Issues to the issues List?
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Am 18.01.2013 um 23:52 schrieb "Dennis E. Hamilton" <[email protected]>:
>
>> I just noticed these changes on issues to clear out old bug assignees.  I 
>> recall a bunch of mystery e-mails being used and now I see issues@ 
>> openoffice.apache.org.
>>
>> That's odd, since that is a mailing list.  It is the mailing list that all 
>> bugzilla issues and issue updates are reported to.  It is automatically CC'd 
>> by bugzilla.  It's atom feed can be subscribed to also: 
>> <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-issues/?format=atom>.
>
> I had figured out together with Herbert some month ago that [email protected] is 
> not automatically CC'd - it has to be on the CC list or the assignee of the 
> issue.
>
> Best Regards, Oliver.
>
>>
>> So I think issues@ o.a.o is not someone who can do anything, including being 
>> assigned a bug?  And the subscribers to issues@ o.a.o already receive 
>> information about such an issue.
>>
>> I suppose that this is a reasonable way to notify folks that the issue is 
>> unclaimed, although a none or no-one assignee might work better.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:40
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Bug 92373] PPT import/export of media events
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92373
>>
>> Rob Weir <[email protected]> changed:
>>
>>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>           Assignee|[email protected]      |[email protected]
>>                   |                            |g
>>
>> --
>> You are receiving this mail because:
>> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>> You are the assignee for the bug.
>>
>

Reply via email to