On Apr 21, 2013 3:26 PM, "Andrea Pescetti" <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> In any case, will you next deal with our OpenGrok and Test link instances, >> which are at Adfinis domains > > > Why not? It would make sense to recognize them as important community services and point opengrok.openoffice.org and testlink.openoffice.org to them. +1 it is no big issue to make. However I see a big difference, these links will only be used by someone who develop/test AOO and not end-users. I think it is fair to expect that volunteers/committers does not get confused.
@rob: Thx for completing the setup of survey.o.o > > >> and of course our downloads which are at sourceforge.org addresses? we could make download.openoffice.org but since we already have download links I would not do that. > > > All the relevant HTML pages are already under openoffice.org; only the final bits are served from non-openoffice.org servers, but we are never advertising non-openoffice.org links for downloads, so no issue here. This is to me THE most important issue.....we only advertise .openoffice.org. There are enough other packages out there who play with words. The newest I found was a package text "formerly openoffice" as if we are dead or taken over. rgds jan i > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
