On 21 April 2013 23:55, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote: > > I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something. > > > > If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have > > something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that uses > > libwpd?). > > answer in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120043#c1 > thx. Now I understand the problems. Would it btw not be smarter in general to have conversions from relative old packages like wordperfect in an extension (as suggested in the bug report), that would help reduce the footprint, and users can still convert. rgds jan I > > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina >
