On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Kevin Grignon <kevingrignon...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I propose we get feedback on second round and identify what aspects of
> each we like.
>
> Let's converge on a design which reflects the best if each.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>

hmmm...I like the gulls in Kevin's designs better. To me, they denote a bit
more movement and action than the other one.

Of the two from Kevin, I like lettering on the first one with lower case
"Apache" but I think it would l might like a darker presentation of Apache
like Samer's design.  I could support an upper case APACHE as well though.
I think the grey Apache with the black "Office" is a nice contrast.

I would totally exclude the "4" in any logo choice..


>
> On May 28, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Kadal Amutham <vka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks like we are retaining almost the current logo with some small
> changes
> >
> > With Warm Regards
> >
> > V.Kadal Amutham
> > 919444360480
> > 914422396480
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2013 04:51, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On May 27, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> >>
> >>> [This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended.  Makes
> >> tracking the discussion difficult.]
> >>>
> >>> I'll bite:
> >>>
> >>> I prefer Chris's latest.  The weight of the lettering is more powerful.
> >> I think the "Apache" should not be so thin. The form used by Samer works
> >> better.  I also think down-scaling will work better in this case.
> >>>
> >>> As far as the orb goes, Chris's could be a tad larger, but not by much.
> >> I prefer the orientation of the foreground bird to Kevin's, which has a
> >> more threatening feel in my subjective experience.
> >>
> >> These are good observations.
> >>
> >> I would like to see it with an "ffi" ligature.
> >>
> >> I think we should leave the 4 out. Others have mentioned that 4 is an
> >> unlucky number is some cultures. Perhaps we have compromise and have
> both
> >> versioned and un-versioned logo designs. If so then I think a treatment
> >> like "Version 4.0" in grey and blue might work.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Dennis
> >>>
> >>> PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the
> current
> >> logo.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> >>> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM
> >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; market...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
> >>>
> >>> What we've done so far:
> >>>
> >>> 1) Called for logo submissions from the community
> >>>
> >>> 2) Many designers responded and we received 40 submissions.  There was
> >>> a lot of "cross-fertilization" of ideas, as designers saw what others
> >>> had come up with, what worked, and borrowed ideas.
> >>>
> >>> 3) We did a survey of user responses to the 40 logo submissions.  Over
> >>> 5000 users offered their ratings and written comments.
> >>>
> >>> 4) Publish report and blog post on the results of the logo survey.
> >>>
> >>> 5) Invited the designers of the top-rated logos to read over the
> >>> survey comments and refine their designs and submit an updated
> >>> version.
> >>>
> >>> That's where we are now.  The updated logos (three of them) are on the
> >> wiki now:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement
> >>>
> >>> As you can see there is quite a bit of convergence on a design
> occurring.
> >>>
> >>> So what next?
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to propose some next steps.
> >>>
> >>> A) Let's discuss the three designs on the mailing list for the next
> >>> week.   The discussion might lead to further refinement.
> >>>
> >>> B) If at the end of the week there is consensus on a single design
> >>> we'll go with that one.
> >>>
> >>> C) If at the end of the week there is not consensus on a single
> >>> design, and the discussion is not leading us closer toward consensus,
> >>> then we'll have a 72-hour vote of PMC members to pick the logo.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> -Rob
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
                             -- Leonard Peltier

Reply via email to