On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld < rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
> Yuzhen Fan schrieb: > > Here is the analysis of possible cases >> > > Hi, > > plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. > > > I will send you bug list for your review >> > > Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge > first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers might think similar. If you > agree we can use my <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype= > runnamed&list_id=133742&namedcmd=410_RegressionTest> (or something > similar?) for a while, I can add "Exclude issue numbers what have been > checked and are no regressions after short mail here, rest fall out of the > list one by one because they got keyword regression or more early version > number or whatever. > > Hi, I cannot open your query above, it returns red warning, have you shared it? > Nevertheless, we should find proceedings what can increase efficiency > by avoiding double work. May be some volunteers add themselves to "QA > Contact" in bugs where they have skills and want to proceed them within a > week or so? > Sounds good, but how about the defects already have value in "QA Contact" (although I do not find one so far)? > > CU > > Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Regards, Yu Zhen
