On 4/30/14 8:19 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 30/04/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 04/30/2014 09:33 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: >>> removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that >>> we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well. >>> Any opinions? >> a beta (or any other pre-release build) has a defined date of expiry and >> shouldn't be used after this. >> So +1 to delete from every mirror server. > > I agree we should remove it both from dist and from SF.
done > >> *Maybe* we can save it (or just a few files) on the archive for >> historical reasons. ;-) > > We voted on 4.1.0-beta. This makes it a release we should archive. Our > archive at > http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.0-beta/ > already has the source and all checksums. Binary files are missing. They > should be moved there too for completeness. And then we can forget about > the beta. the problem is that I made a mistake and that the binaries are not longer available on the server. Because it is very time consuming and the binaries are for convenience only I will not upload them again. We should delete the checksum files for the binaries as well and should keep the src release only. Juergen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
