Am 10/02/2014 03:04 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 02/10/14 14:33, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Jürgen Schmidt<jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
after a longer vacation and some silence in the past weeks I would like
to discuss the release manager role.
I think it's time that somebody else takes over this role and drives
active the next release. I did it since the beginning of OpenOffice at
Apache but I think it is a good opportunity for somebody to be more
active in the community and take over some responsibility.
Hi Juergen,
Thanks, from all I assume, for your efforts in this area. Not only
were you the Release Manager, but you defined the role itself for AOO,
a project with more complicated release requirements than most others
at Apache.
If someone was considering stepping in as the Release Manager for the
next release, what should they be looking at? Is there a wiki page or
other documentation that defines the process?
not yet but we should collect the different pieces in one place to make
it easier and to have a reference or some kind of check list ...
please write also a list about requirements for the release manager
(e.g., has to do the dev/beta/release builds). When this is known it's
easier to say for everybody yes or no to the role.
Thanks
Marcus
Also, are you able to review and update (if needed) the available
documentation and/or help mentor the next Release Manager? Or do
you think this is all documented enough that someone can just step in
and RTFM?
sure I will be available for any questions and will support the release
manager.
Juergen
Regards,
-Rob
We have released some important milestones over the years and have
enough experience and know what's necessary. Whoever takes over the
release manager role won't be alone and will get the support from the
community. In the same way I got it in the past.
We had discussions about the way how to communicate and track the
release planning and the progress and now it's the time that people can
realize this. It's always room for improvements.
The goal is that this somewhat important role is circulating and not
depending on one person only. The releases are anyway a community effort
and the release manager have to take care of some necessary formalism.
And to make it easier a further goal is to be able to take binary builds
from our build bots and release them. Currently we rely on builds made
by community members but I think it's better to use official build bots
for that. This means that we have to check the Windows build bot and the
binaries if they can be used already or what is missing. It means that
we need Linux build bots with the correct baseline or increase the
baseline. And finally we need a Mac build bot. But this discussion
should take place in a separate thread.
For now I would like to invite all of you to think about the release
manager role and if is something for you. I will not be available as
release manager for the next release.
Juergen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
