OK, here is why I was looking for this. Thanks for the links, Kay. The RAT scan linked to in the [VOTE] message for 4.1.1 lists only seven files for aoo401/main/writerperfect.
Looking in the apache-openoffice-4.1.1-r1517669-src.zip, I see 33 files that could have comments and notices. Looking at aoo-4.1.1/writerperfect/source/filter/DocumentCollector.cxx, the first one I chose to examine, I see three Copyright notices and an LGPL license notice in the comments at the top of the file. The same file, and the others, appear at <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/writerperfect/> as well as <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/> at revision 1645375. I'm no expert on RAT. I can't account for the peculiar situation. I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 15:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.) On 12/13/2014 01:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Looking around for some other matters, I notice there is no 4.1.1 branch in > the SVN. Is this intentional? yes...see the following mail threads http://markmail.org/message/qrjxespr3di7dxh7 http://markmail.org/message/cpqm4zysz4sd4ley [ ... ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
