> -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 11:31 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > > Thanks Dennis, > > The only remaining issue I think is the preference to use groupId > 'org.openoffice' . > > I am waiting on an answer to if that is a problem with Nexus in the > Infra issue I opened and will report back then. > > As far as I can tell all other projects have an 'org.apache.xxx' > groupId. > > see comment below. > > > On 11/29/2015 12:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > The wiki compilation on UNO is a work in progress. It has not been > touched in any important way since 2009. The wiki link does provide > more linked information; it is valuable in that respect. I agree that > [1] is a better intended place. > > > > It is not clear whether there remains information that is only > available on the web site. The current page [2] links to the wiki and > the link for downloading the SDK is broken. On that basis alone, [1] is > preferable. > > > > > > - Dennis > > > > SIDE NOTES > > > > This is challenging, > <https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Effort/Migrate_Documentation>. > The migration was started in 2006 and status was last updated in July > 2007 (at 15% complete). I don't notice how connectivity to the web > pages is preserved pending movement of material. That [2] apparently > provides no link to other material on the web site means you have to > look in the SVN to see what additional material is there. > > > > ([2] is exactly as imported into Apache OpenOffice from the original > OO.o site repository. One feature of the page is that it links to the > focus areas page with a handy listing legacy projects from OO.o and > whatever on-line material there is about them, > <http://www.openoffice.org/projects/accepted.html>. We should manage to > hold onto that somehow. Maybe add it to the wiki page?) > [cmarcum] > > I have updated them to use the wiki URL [1] > > As a general question, Was there larger attempt to move content to the > wiki before Ooo came to Apache? > > And if so, should there be an effort to continue this migration and > deprecate web pages after adding links to the newer wiki page? [orcmid]
My impression is that the migration was started at Sun but not completed. According to the July 2007 status, the work was estimated to be only 15% completed. I did nose around the web site for the pages that are not linked to but still there. A significant amount of information is still only available on the web site, although even that has sketchy parts and it depends on cross-references to the API documentation that don't always seem to work as intended. It appears that continuing the migration of the documentation would be an extensive task requiring strong expert knowledge of how UNO works, especially at the binary level. > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 06:13 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > >> Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > >> > >> Comment on URL below. > > [ ... ] > >> I just found this wiki page [1] that says it's the replacement to the > >> URL I have listed in the POM [2]. > >> > >> I think I should use [1] instead. > >> > >> [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno > >> [2] http://www.openoffice.org/udk > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Carl > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
