+1 to proceed with NEXT STEP™ towards getting AOO signed for Gatekeeper. Peter, don’t get yourself lost in historic discussions and perhaps unwillingness to tackle this. Some developers have been satisfied with the status quo since we have a workaround (an awful one). So please, if you can bring some facts to the table, and consult a bit with INFRA then I think what we need more than anything else is someone just driving it through!
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 9. okt. 2016 kl. 19.31 skrev Peter Kovacs <legi...@gmail.com>: > > Thanks for the insight. > > > On 09.10.2016 17:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> So this is not impossible, but probably a prerequisite will be to sign MacOS >> X packages with a signature that Apple (to be precise, Gatekeeper) >> recognizes as valid. I have no idea on what this entails. The ASF has a >> signing solution (from Symantec) available, but if I recall correctly it >> does not apply to Mac, only Windows. I can double-check but, due to a long >> history of misunderstandings and unfulfilled promises between OpenOffice and >> ASF Infra on this, I'd like to be sure that we are serious about getting >> this done before proceeding. > > I agree. This is a complex topic with a lots of possible missunderstandings > if not spoken clearly. > I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist involved? > > What kind of seriousness do you need? > Like I volunteering to drive this in a civilised provesional mannor would be > sufficient for you? > Or should we do a vote? > > In case of a vote, I would prepare all the facts I can find. So everyone can > have at least a summary what we are heading towards before proceeding. > Of course this will take a bit. Since I am not Quick :-D. > > All the best > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
