That specific bug has already been tested. It is a symptom of the unfortunate fact that what I don't know about the AOO source code can hurt us, in the form of unexpected regressions.

The more different testing, the better. Linked files are the general area that should be hit most, but any and all regression testing is useful.

On 9/20/2017 3:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b7b4b86ca38d03eb5c72a4acc80b399ec7e7cb0a739d72d40b3cb49c@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E

On Sep 20, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote:


From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reported OLE issue w/ RC2

Hi Jim,

Could you provide DEBs as well?

Windows builds can now be found here:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-414-pre-RC3/

Can you specify which OLE error should be tested? Link to the relevant issue?


Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to