I want to avoid ANY confusion at all, hence trashing the concept or "tag" of RC3. IMO, it's safer.
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 21.09.2017 um 22:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> At this point, I believe all blockers have been accounted for. A >> search of BUGZ shows no 4.1.4 blockers requested or accepted (and >> not yet applied). > > great. Thanks Jim for your flexibility short before your leave. > > Another thing @all: > > Do we have to call the new bits really RC4? Nobody hasn't seen RC3 even, not > the mirros. when looking at the new included things I have the feeling that > there is nearly nothing (please don't count peanuts here) but nevertheless > increasing the RC numbering. But I don't see any reason for this. > > So, please keep building but call it RC3 and upload as RC3. > > Thanks > > Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
