Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?

No.

>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>>
>> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
>>
>> Regards, Matthias
>>
>> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
>>
>>
>> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
>>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
>>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>>>
>>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>>>
>>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>>>
>>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
>>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can
>>> start on 4.1.4-RC5
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to