sdk 10.9 lacks Python. No idea why.

Install sdk 10.11 and configure should find and use that one.

All this is fixed in trunk.

> On Oct 26, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi -
> 
> Well this is a royal pain to setup.
> 
> I’ve done the xcodelegacy and have installed the 10.7 and 10.9 SDKs.
> 
> I have a fresh copy of the branch AOO414. I run and now it cannot find python 
> headers.
> 
> checking which python to use... compiling against system python 
> (/usr/bin/python)
> compiling against system python (version 2.7)
> checking Python.h usability... no
> checking Python.h presence... no
> checking for Python.h... no
> configure: error: Python headers not found
> 
> I need help. What the heck happened to my Python setup?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net 
>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> I’m building AOO 4.1.4 using macOS12 library and made it all the way to VCL 
>> where I get:
>> 
>> /Users/davewave/Development/aoo-4.1.4/main/vcl/aqua/source/dtrans/PictToBmpFlt.cxx:34:10:
>>  fatal error: 'QuickTime/QuickTime.h' file not found
>> #include <QuickTime/QuickTime.h>
>> 
>> Do I need to use XCodeLegacy and point to 10.7?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>>> On Oct 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net 
>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi -
>>> 
>>> I am now on Xcode 8.3.3. Cleaned up and reset.
>>> 
>>> I now I’m on an issues with Redland:
>>> 
>>> configure: error: Raptor  is too old - see http://librdf.org/raptor/ 
>>> <http://librdf.org/raptor/> to get a 2.0.7 or newer
>>> dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
>>> '../unxmaccx.pro/misc/build/so_configured_so_rasqal'
>>> 
>>> 1 module(s): 
>>>     redland
>>> need(s) to be rebuilt
>>> 
>>> Reason(s):
>>> 
>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
>>> /Users/davewave/Development/aoo/main/redland/rasqal
>>> 
>>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
>>> running:
>>> 
>>>     build --all:redland
>>> 
>>> Looking into this it looks bogus and I went past the check and now:
>>> 
>>> configure: error: Rasqal is not installed or too old - see 
>>> http://librdf.org/rasqal/ <http://librdf.org/rasqal/> to get a version in 
>>> range 0.9.25 to 0.9.99
>>> dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
>>> '../unxmaccx.pro/misc/build/so_configured_so_redland'
>>> 
>>> 1 module(s): 
>>>     redland
>>> need(s) to be rebuilt
>>> 
>>> Reason(s):
>>> 
>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
>>> /Users/davewave/Development/aoo/main/redland/redland
>>> 
>>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
>>> running:
>>> 
>>>     build --all:redland
>>> 
>>> Looks like I have something off in my environment.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 25, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net 
>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks. I have Xcode 9 which has the following:
>>>> 
>>>> $ xcodebuild -showsdks
>>>> iOS SDKs:
>>>>    iOS 11.0                        -sdk iphoneos11.0
>>>> 
>>>> iOS Simulator SDKs:
>>>>    Simulator - iOS 11.0            -sdk iphonesimulator11.0
>>>> 
>>>> macOS SDKs:
>>>>    macOS 10.13                     -sdk macosx10.13
>>>> 
>>>> tvOS SDKs:
>>>>    tvOS 11.0                       -sdk appletvos11.0
>>>> 
>>>> tvOS Simulator SDKs:
>>>>    Simulator - tvOS 11.0           -sdk appletvsimulator11.0
>>>> 
>>>> watchOS SDKs:
>>>>    watchOS 4.0                     -sdk watchos4.0
>>>> 
>>>> watchOS Simulator SDKs:
>>>>    Simulator - watchOS 4.0         -sdk watchsimulator4.0
>>>> 
>>>> I modified configure to target 10.13 and adjusted the egrep:
>>>> 
>>>> sdk_found=`xcodebuild -showsdks | $EGREP "sdk macosx10.(10|11|12|13)" | 
>>>> sed -e "s/.*sdk //" | head -n1`
>>>> 
>>>> Also - 
>>>> #   sdk_target=10.9                                                        
>>>>                                                                            
>>>>                                 
>>>>    sdk_target=10.13
>>>> 
>>>> The last means the environment variable MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET in the 
>>>> release script is not used.
>>>> 
>>>> On to the next issue with the category B downloads. Certificate store 
>>>> issues giving 500 errors.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, I noticed a version 5.5 of Tomcat ….
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:32 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com 
>>>>> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually, if you have Xcode7 or Xcode8, there is no need for
>>>>> Xcodelegacy at all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> All Xcodelegacy does is obtain older macOS SDKs and installs them
>>>>> in Xcode. But we use the latest SDK available (via configure). So
>>>>> Xcodelegacy is not a requirement/dependency per se. It's just
>>>>> useful in case we get into a situation where we need to
>>>>> use an older SDK rather than the latest.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2017, at 6:00 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net 
>>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’m hung up on what I should do with 
>>>>>> https://github.com/devernay/xcodelegacy 
>>>>>> <https://github.com/devernay/xcodelegacy> 
>>>>>> <https://github.com/devernay/xcodelegacy 
>>>>>> <https://github.com/devernay/xcodelegacy>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What should I download before I run the scripts? Which form of the 
>>>>>> command should I use?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BTW - this requirement is only mentioned in the build release script.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I wanted to validate build instructions. Should I take these two from 
>>>>>>> your github for my MacOS Sierra environment?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 7:31 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just a FYI that I am tracking dmake and epm on the
>>>>>>>> below Github pages:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> o https://github.com/jimjag/epm <https://github.com/jimjag/epm> 
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/jimjag/epm <https://github.com/jimjag/epm>>
>>>>>>>> o https://github.com/jimjag/dmake <https://github.com/jimjag/dmake> 
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/jimjag/dmake <https://github.com/jimjag/dmake>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I know we are moving away from dmake, but IMO it'll take
>>>>>>>> some time for that to be complete. Plus, updating to the
>>>>>>>> latest version of EPM is useful (it's the ONLY way to build
>>>>>>>> the macOS versions now, for example), but we also need
>>>>>>>> the AOO-specific patches in there. Which are included
>>>>>>>> in my forks.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just topic for discussion and chewing over
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to