Don't we use C++ 2003? On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Peter kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> I had to build with -std=c++11 on gcc 7. > C++98 did not work as far as I remeber. > C++17 did lead also to failure I believe. > > So I think we use features from the partial support already. > > Am 26. März 2018 03:03:56 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org>: > >On 25 Mar, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> What version of the C++ standard should we code to? > > > >At least for now, C++ 98. The version of gcc in CentOS 6 only has > >partial support for C++ 0x. > > > >Our Windows build instructions currently recommend a 2007 version of > >the > >compiler and libraries, which predate the 2011 standard. > > > >> For example, can the move to STL use features that were added in C++ > >11? > > > >These may be available via boost. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
