Does it make sense to reorg the gstreamer module into an extention? We could then have multiple versions of it.
I mean after all this is only a optional feature, thats important to some not all.
On 25.04.2018 16:18, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I think this shows that we need to come to *some* consensus on how to handle the gstreamer stuff. Either we provide both CentOS6 and Ubuntu builds to our community or we fold in the proposed gstreamer "work-around" which makes it a purely runtime concern. I would love to see how far we can go with the latter, but I am loath to volunteer someone else to "do the work" since I am unsure what the exact status of the patch is, how to fold it into trunk and how to handle building with the patch folded in. I know that there are other issues related to being at the stage to branch AOO420 from trunk but this, to me, seems like the priority at this point. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
