Am 21.10.2018 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs:
When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. I check
tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the weekend.
just to prevent misunderstandings:
My suggestion was a general improvement and not limited to this release.
Of course the 4.1.6 should not wait for this.
Marcus
Am 21. Oktober 2018 20:19:53 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
<matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
Am 21.10.18 um 20:08 schrieb Marcus:
Am 21.10.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 21.10.18 um 19:59 schrieb Marcus:
Am 20.10.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
That's what it looks like, yeah.
copyright years are always forgotten to update. Every year the
same.
;-)
In fact I *did* update it for trunk in January... ;-)
hm, OK. Are you sure that you have updated it everywhere it is
needed?
Even here the script could be helpful.
I did update it where we always(TM) updated it:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1780015
But there are several parts (ODK, Linux packaging) which should get
some
attention.
In 4.1.x they were not updated in all these years...
So +1 for a script from me!
Matthias
Marcus
But my test build are always with --with-vendor in configure, so I
didn't realize that it was missing from branch 4.1.6.
Matthias
We now have a script to update version numbers; somewhere in the
devtools I think.
What about to create a new script to list all the code lines with a
the year number. Then someone can have a look and compare it with
the
current calendar year and if needed create a patch to update all
affected year numbers at ones.
Maybe a good first step because no year number is forgotten. The
next
one would be to automate this update. But I've not yet an idea how
to
do this.
What do you think?
Marcus
On Oct 20, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Matthias Seidel
<matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
Am 20.10.18 um 17:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Found it.
Great!
Fixed in r1844422 and r1844423
That means, when using --vendor it is updated automatically,
otherwise not?
On Oct 20, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>
wrote:
Are we sure that that part of the splash screen isn't hardcoded
in
(ie: the Copyright part)?
I know that I use '--with-vendor="Apache OpenOffice Community
Build" \' for macOS and I am guessing the buildbots also use
that
configure option, so maybe that's a clue.
On Oct 20, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Pedro Lino
<pedro.l...@mailbox.org>
wrote:
That is probably because your OS is named Darwin (more
evolved?) :)
<Build1844227_Linux_x86_64.png>
On October 20, 2018 at 2:35 PM Jim Jagielski
<j...@jagunet.com>
wrote:
Hmmm... The macOS builds are showing 2018:
<Screen Shot 2018-10-20 at 9.34.44 AM.png>
On Oct 20, 2018, at 7:14 AM, Pedro Lino <
pedro.l...@mailbox.org <mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org>>
wrote:
But even if I wanted, I can not change the copyright
year...
That's what I am wondering about. ;-)
Ok. I (wrongly) assumed it was all editable :)
BTW: Can you confirm 2017 as copyright year in Jim's
Linux
builds?
Yes, Jim's build is showing 2017.
Regards,
Pedro
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
