Hello Damjan, I figured it out under Debian >= 9 with Java 8u222.
We need also a solution to detect java 11 which is used in Debian 10 (buster, stable) Am 18.08.19 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Damjan, > > Thank you for looking into it! > > Indeed it was Ubuntu 16.04 where I could replicate the problem with > OpenJDK8u222. > > Am 18.08.19 um 03:06 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >> Before: >> java.vendor=Oracle Corporation >> >> After: >> java.vendor=Private Build >> >> This is apparently something Java now allows configuring when it's built: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221171 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/e0b7721459ee >> >> We probably need to relax the vendor checks, as we'll soon be flooded by >> different java.vendor properties on different platforms, as different >> package repositories begin setting their own... > > Definitely! > > I have this changelog for Ubuntu: > > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/435284148/openjdk-8_8u212-b03-0ubuntu1.19.04.2_8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~19.04.1.diff.gz > > Searching for --with-vendor-name gives several results. > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> >> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:39 AM Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing... >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32 AM Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 8.202.8 and 8.212.4.1 work for me on FreeBSD. >>>> >>>> Let me see if I can find 8u222 somewhere. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:23 PM Matthias Seidel < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> If nobody can confirm this it must be an error on every installation >>>>> that I run... >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise it would be a release blocker for 4.1.7! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Matthias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 14.08.19 um 16:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>> Hi Damjan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 14.08.19 um 07:02 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does "java --version" give? >>>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0_222" >>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build >>>>> 1.8.0_222-8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~16.04.1-b10) >>>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode) >>>>>> >>>>>>> You might need to backport the following commit to 4.1.x: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> commit 3bd2d6aed629c4323ea9e8426acfb793eb9046fd >>>>>>> Author: Damjan Jovanovic <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Date: Sun Apr 15 15:00:46 2018 +0000 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Allow the Java version suffix (eg. the 162 in 1.8.0_162) to be >>>>>>> 3 digits long. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Patch by: me >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk@1829211 >>>>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>>> Just to clarify: >>>>>> >>>>>> This also happens with AOO 4.2.0 (I installed Jims last build from July >>>>>> on Xubuntu). >>>>>> I really think that there was a change in the Java update 8u222. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:19 PM Matthias Seidel < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Today I noticed that on my Ubuntu machine OpenJDK 8u222 isn't listed >>>>> in >>>>>>>> AOO (4.1.6) anymore. >>>>>>>> But everything works, it seems to be detected and to be used, that is >>>>>>>> why I didn't notice it earlier. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do remember that I got the update from Java 8u212 to Java 8u222 >>>>> some >>>>>>>> time ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my test VM with Ubuntu (32-bit) which has still Java 8u212 >>>>> installed >>>>>>>> it is visible in AOO. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can anyone confirm this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> > -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
