Hi,

On the said page i.e.
https://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html#why-apache-openoffice
there is a statement:

"With a fully open development process,
Apache OpenOffice has nothing to hide - the product stands or falls on its
reputation".

To take "one step at a time" and not to lose sight of the long term is what
OpenOffice needs.


Greetings,

Czesław

Am So., 24. Mai 2020 um 11:21 Uhr schrieb Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>:

>
> Am 24.05.20 um 11:10 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> > It's not that I think it would be good to use OOXML (I mean instead of
> ODF), it's just that users need this feature.
>
> Nobody thinks OOXML is an unimportant feature. I have not seen anyone
> against it. We have already multiple Ideas how to close the gap.
>
> However our 4.2.0 is our next milestone, and we should focus on that.
> That will be a huge step forward for the project as it is consisted
>
> at the moment.
>
> I suggest one step at a time. If there is a capable developer who can do
> this, we will guide him through our ideas.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to