> -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:06 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: we are a ASF-project > > Am 09.09.20 um 20:39 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2020 8:15 PM > >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: we are a ASF-project > >> > >> Am 09.09.20 um 20:00 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > >>>> Even "open source" vs. "open-source" has already been > >>>> discussed in June. > >>> > >>> So you think it is in the interest of the ASF if one of its > >> projects uses a different spelling than the ASF itself? > >> > >> I understand your statement as a provocation. So, what do > you want to > >> reach with this? > > > > I don't want to achieve anything with it, because I can't > achieve anything formally with it, because the discussion is closed. > > > > I just point out to all of us that it seems to me a strange > procedure to discuss spelling. > > > > [...] > > > > Marcus, things are much easier than you think. > > > > I know that in German the spelling of "Open Source" vs. > "Open-Source" vs. "OpenSource" is quite controversial. Far > less is (or: seems to me) controversial in English and so the > spelling "open-source" caught my eye. > > but you make it soooo complicated.
No, I don't do that and that I don't do that is already evident from the fact that I first cast my vote (which formally closed the whole thing) and only then made the remark about the "-". Did you really think it was right to accuse me of "provocation"(?) I understand very well that time is short (of all participants), I just don't think it is appropriate to react angry to every unforeseen speech. Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
