On 28.12.20 15:40, Marcus wrote:
Am 28.12.20 um 14:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a
blog
article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article
moot with the actual release?
Yes I think it is worth it and we should train to do such things more
often.
First of all we prepare our community on the patch. It will be the
first time that we tell them what we did and why.
The second benefitial point is we will set a expectation. Currently
it is still fuzzy one, but people will be looking for an update more
frequently, so if we deliver a week later that would be awesome.
On third: In the blogpost is we invite for testing. So maybe m,ore
people will show up to look at the Release Candidate.
but then we shouldn't forget to mention the download location of the
RCs. Only then more people can help to test.
Marcus
We would then only learn of it if people run into issues. I rather have
them write a short mail to dev list, as I have suggested it in the proposal.
My last pro argument is we need also to link other channels to the
blog post. On facebook it takes some days untill a post reaches the
people.
So in case we extend the range it would be great. Just as a reminder,
we usually do not say anything, and people are used that the dev team
works more behind the scene.
Maybe it is better to address the issue with the release
announcement...?
On Dec 27, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi -
I made extensive edits for consistency and language.
Patricia, please take a look if you wish.
Regards,
Dave
On Dec 27, 2020, at 9:20 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>
wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was:
[lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be
edited. We cannot promise a release by the end of the year.
We should not imply that macOS Big Sur is the only reason for
4.1.9. All platforms will benefit.
Thanks for your efforts.
+1 once the text is properly edited.
see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=173080814
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
--
This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
