Hi Peter, Am 29.12.20 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM >>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page >>>> >>>> >>>>> Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. >>>> +1 >>> Don't you care if users can't find their way around and therefore >>> stop using AOO? >>> >>> That was exactly the result of the thread that prompted me to >>> suggest a small correction on the download page. >>> >>> The thread is unfortunately in German, but here is the link: >>> http://de.openoffice.info/viewtopic.php?p=293070#p293070 >> You should have started your discussion with this context. >> >> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that Windows >> users of AOO don’t know that they require a 32 bit Java than it is to >> suggest a minor fix to the download page. > Java 32 bit is part of the release notes.
Users don't read Release Notes. ;-) And after the change I expect users to ask, why they can't find a version for their 64-bit Windows... You cannot do it right! Regards, Matthias >> >> Thanks, >> Dave >> >>> >>> Jörg >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
