On 12/30/2020 10:46 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 30, 2020, at 2:06 AM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> On 30.12.20 00:08, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Fernando Cassia <fcas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue., 29 Dec. 2020, 05:55 Jörg Schmidt, <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a footer on each
>>>>> archive page informing that this is an archive page plus a link to the
>>>>> start page (web and wiki) of the current pages.
>>>>>
>>>> I like the model used by Mozilla here:
>>>>
>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Web/Browser_Detection_and_Cross_Browser_Support
>>>>
>>>> Header " *This is an archived page.* It's not actively maintained."
>>>>
>>>> Blurb: " *Warning:* *The content of this article may be out of date.* This
>>>> article was written in 2003"
>>> I like that approach.
>>>
>>> I’ll work to support it.
>>
>> I can work with this too. However currently you can select one or the other 
>> for all our pages.
>>
>> In the discussion we have to go through each page and decide what we do with 
>> this page. I do not believe there is any way to get around the principle.
>>
>> That is why I would like to have a basic concept that we can apply. And the 
>> concept should encourage work and not block it. In this context this seems 
>> like a fair approach
> 
> The two websites are in a Git repository and changes can be reverted. There 
> is no need to be concerned about mistakes.
> 
> MediaWiki pages track versions. I think (but need confirmation) that as long 
> as pages are not moved or deleted that changes can be reverted.

You are correct Dave and they can also be redirected if the entire
document is outdated and have the new document opened if someone clicks
on the outdated link.

> 
> I fail to see a need to officially archive separately when our tools already 
> fill this need.

I agree entirely that archiving is a waste of time and effort when the
current tools already can do what is needed.

Regards
Keith

> 
> Plus, the Way Back Machine - web.archive.org is crawling our websites since 
> 2011.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to