Hello Matthias, On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:43:25PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Arrigo, > > Am 13.02.22 um 17:22 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > > Hello Matthias, All, > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > >> Hi Arrigo, > >> > >> Same here: Would this also be wanted in trunk and AOO42X? > > I think so. This commit had to be adjusted because AOO42X and trunk do > > not seem to support Java 1.7, whereas AOO41X did. > > > > I merged the other one about the `tmp' folder. > > > > Thank you for pointing this out! My bad; I should not work on trunk > > directly... > > No problem, I just want to have the branches in sync as much as possible. Sure! [...] > The fix for "Azul" is just for building? > > I ask, because on Windows the Azul JDK is already detected. But it is > listed as "OpenJDK" like the one from Adoptium. Maybe we can make that > list a bit more clear? The commit changes the logic that selects whether "mac.java.path" shall be set to "mac.oracle.java.path" or "mac.apple.java.path". Apparently, there are two ``families'' of JDK's under macOS, and each family keeps its base classes in a different path. This edit only affects building under macOS. Do you suggest that an explanation like the above shall be integrated into the file as a comment? Best regards, -- Arrigo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org