Am 16. Oktober 2025 16:13:28 MESZ schrieb Bidouille <[email protected]>:
>The current website is not fully operational, so I can only agree that it 
>should be replaced.
>But what will happen to the existing extensions? 
>Will be migrated to the new one?
A good question. 
I think if we build a new system we should be able to migrate content in full 
or in part. however maybe we have requirements on the extension that we offer 
in future.
Like it must be Open source or AL2 licensed or whatever. We should discuss this 
in General.
>
>----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Peter Kovacs" <[email protected]>
>> À: "dev" <[email protected]>, "Andrea Pescetti" <[email protected]>
>> Envoyé: Lundi 13 Octobre 2025 17:51:55
>> Objet: (discussion) new extension Site (was: proposal for new extension page)
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Maybe the proposal was to technical. Lets try it a less technical
>> approach.
>> In a former Discussion we have (imho) concluded that we will need a
>> extension web site, at least for the open source extensions.
>> I hope this is still concent (please write a short agreement.)
>> 
>> if that is the case, I see the following requirements:
>> - Extension Page
>> -- intelligent search function
>> -- browsing by tags / category
>> -- fields:
>> # Provider + contact
>> # Application
>> # license
>> # Tags / Category
>> # screenshots
>> # source code link
>> # last updated
>> # compatibility
>> # downloadlink
>> ## support for own ASF source or external link (maybe only allowed to
>> whitelisted addresses (SF, github, bitbucket, googlecode?)
>> # Description
>> # List of published versions
>> # violation report
>> 
>> 
>> - Extension maintainer page
>> # Fields to set up
>> ## dropdown for license field
>> ## dynamic tags creation? (there is a document archivment server, i
>> think it can autocreate tags)
>> ## easy contact for support
>> 
>> - moderation page
>> -- list of extension to moderate (new/ reported)
>> -- approve / Reject / open button
>> -- Discussion history to track desicions and  reasoning
>> 
>> - Roles (admin, moderator, extensionporvider)
>> -- login (admin per asf sso, moderator & provider per passkey, 2fa?)
>> 
>> - webside in general
>> -- try to be small and responsive (loadtime 1s if possible)
>> -- cookie free (if posible)
>> -- tracking free
>> -- simple layout configuration (logo, design etc)
>> -- mobile layout
>> -- WCAG 2.1 Standards (mind. Level AA)
>> -- Screen-Reader-compatibility
>> -- dark mode
>> -- touch device ready
>> -- maybe warnings for unsopported devices for AOO
>> 
>> -crawlers
>> -- Sitemap & robots.txt
>> -- meta descriptores
>> --
>> 
>> Whats your thoughts?
>> 
>> All the best
>> Peter
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Am 02.10.2025 11:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> > Hi all,
>> > 
>> > I discussed the case this morning with deep seek, what our options
>> > are, what is the best tech stack going forward, if we would start
>> > from
>> > the scratch.
>> > 
>> > The requirement I gave the AI was that we host templates and
>> > extensions, and we need a tech solution which is easy maintainable
>> > for
>> > 1 or 2 Medicare web developers and we need moderation capabilities.
>> > 
>> > The ai discourages the use of Drupal ( WordPress, typo3 are the
>> > ones I
>> > know and Drupal was the best choice so far, I check others if I
>> > remember), because of it's steep learning curve and the reliance on
>> > contributed modules. It admits we would get a fast start but it
>> > predicts maintenance issues in the long run.
>> > 
>> > The clear recommendation was to build a frontend with Django, a
>> > Postgress As Backend db, combined with a ceph or miniO as Object
>> > storage.
>> > Search engine elastic search or meilisearch
>> > 
>> > Deployment using docker. Which is the plan anyhow.
>> > 
>> > I ask what about an update of our Drupal instance and the ai
>> > argument
>> > again against it. It says there are a lot of changes between Drupal
>> > 7
>> > and 10. ( I did not mention any versions)
>> > 
>> > Your thoughts?
>> > I can push the ai conversation if you want to read it and I can try
>> > other LLMs too
>> > 
>> > All the best
>> > Peter
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to