You know, this is likely a good job to sic some LLM on. Let me burn some tokens.

> On Jun 8, 2026, at 1:55 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I think we are both right, in a way. The fact is that trunk and AOO42X _have_ 
> diverged, and doing straight cherry-picks from trunk to AOO42X may, or may 
> not, work. 
> 
> Naming aside, I think that we should at least try to get AOO-ng out.
> 
>> On Jun 8, 2026, at 9:58 AM, Pedro Lino via dev <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim
>> 
>> I am pretty sure that it is the other way around. Newer fixes are always 
>> added to trunk and cherry picked to 42X (and/or 41X)
>> 
>> jbampton has been committing changes to trunk (as you can see in the dev 
>> mailing list) so these are the newer changes.
>> 
>> I think the easiest path is to rename 42x to 42Xold and branch trunk to a 
>> new 42X
>> 
>> I am pretty sure there isn't any feature/function that was added directly to 
>> 42X (but unfortunately Matthias isn't here to confirm) so there should be no 
>> code loss.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Pedro
>> 
>>> On 06/08/2026 1:17 PM WEST Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Over the last month while working on the various Python and Aarm64 stuff, 
>>> it made me really, really aware of just how divergent the AOO42X and trunk 
>>> branches have become. A lot, and I mean a LOT, is just whitespace changes, 
>>> but that causes any really analysis regarding the differences between the 2 
>>> to be loaded with a lot of noise.
>>> 
>>> So what to do...?
>>> 
>>> Option 1:
>>> Branch off the new trunk off of AOO42x and then backport functional changes 
>>> of the old trunk to new trunk? Keep old trunk as 'old-trunk'
>>> 
>>> Option 2:
>>> Backport all the whitespace differences to AOO42X, even if they collide or 
>>> reverse the more "correct" fixes in AOO42X.
>>> 
>>> My preference would be Option 1, since I think it _might_ be easier and, I 
>>> think, the whitespace changes in AOO42X are the more correct and the more 
>>> recent.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> --
>>> Jim
>>> "This is an outrage!"
>>>                       Tony Harrison
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> --
> Jim
>  "This is an outrage!"
>                        Tony Harrison
> 

--
Jim
  "This is an outrage!"
                        Tony Harrison

Reply via email to