I like that idea... I'm sure some Installer code could determine the arch and 
then copy the correct binary as required. I've never written anything like 
that, macOS-wise that is...

On 2026/09/03 16:03:19 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 17:56:56 +0200
> [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Am 03.09.2026 um 14:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > > Hmmm if when doing a macOS build it tries to do Linux packaging, then 
> > > something is seriously wonky.
> > 
> > This is the proposal the ai did for my build
> > 
> > Is ~6–8 focused edits in 
> > |scp2/source/python/{file,profileitem,module}_python.scp| — make the 
> > macOS branches follow the existing non-macOS UNX path 
> > (|python-core-$(PYVERSION).zip|, |libpython3.11.dylib|, 
> > |$ORIGIN/python-core-…| for |PYTHONHOME|/|PYTHONPATH|), and delete the 
> > framework |Directory|/|Unixlink| block for macOS. It matches what's 
> > actually built. There's one runtime unknown (pyuno's |-framework Python| 
> > link flag on macOS) that we'd shake out by launching the built app.
> > 
> > Can pus it for review.
> > 
> 
> 
> A crude but easy suggestion: package both MacOS builds together, and them 
> with a small piece of code that decides which to install.  The User need not 
> be queried about the CPU type.
> 
> Not an elegant solution, but quick and simple.
> 
> Rory
> 
>  > >> On Sep 3, 2026, at 8:12 AM, Peter Kovacs<[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Am 3. September 2026 12:00:37 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski 
> > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Sep 3, 2026, at 2:00 AM,[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I was able to build a complete production build. Only the packaging 
> > >>>> did not work.
> > >>> What happened during the packaging? I've been able to create the full 
> > >>> DMG.
> > >> It was about the python 3 layout. Afaik it was in Linux layout but the 
> > >> packager expected something different.
> > >> But exact issue I need to check again. I don't think it is a big deal. 
> > >> Maybe the config option was wrong too.
> > >>>> Awesome work jim! I was not aware we are that far.
> > >>>> I do a smoke test if that works then i  will distribute the test 
> > >>>> version for testers. (the issue czeslaw found should be applicable on 
> > >>>> this build too.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The fix is in testing on windows. If you want to test but do not have 
> > >>>> a machine I can provide you project referenced machine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I try to build intel version next.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> All the best
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Peter.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:[email protected]
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:[email protected]
> > >>>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Jim
> > >>> "This is an outrage!"
> > >>>                        Tony Harrison
> > >>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:[email protected] 
> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:[email protected] 
> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > --
> > > Jim
> > >    "This is an outrage!"
> > >                          Tony Harrison
> > >
> > >
> 
> -- 
> Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to