Hi Petko,

I will be traveling the next two weeks, but the test suit of the ODF
toolkit is described here:

ODF Toolkit
https://odftoolkit.org/conformance/ODFValidator.html

Godspeed!
Svante



<[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 30. Okt. 2026, 17:01:

> Hi Svante,
>
> Can you help us to test the files AOO creates for ODF 1.3 /1.4?
> I think there is a test suite? o
>
> All the best
>
> Peter
>
> Am 29.10.2026 um 23:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > Yes, and the detail is subtle. Needless to say, when looking into
> ODF-1.3 there were some issues that made us somewhat in error regarding
> 1.2/1.2-extended. So the goal was to completely reverify us against that
> standard and use that as the starting point for 1.3/1.3-extended.
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 29, 2026, at 5:30 PM, Pedro Lino via dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim
> >>
> >> Do you mean support 1.3 and push on to 1.4?
> >> Branch 4.1 already saves to ODF 1.2 Extended by default
> >>
> >> Unless I am missing some technical detail?
> >>
> >> And yes, it would be great to at least support ODF 1.3 and get rid of
> the warning each time you open an ODF from other Office Suites.
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >>> On 10/29/2026 8:12 PM WET Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> With the push for AOO50X, one big topic would be ODF 1.2/1.3 support
> and 'compliance'. To that end, I've been working on getting `trunk` in
> ODF-1.2 worthy shape and am at the home stretch. To that end, I have a
> branch, called `odf-devel` which includes all the changes and a DRAFT
> to-be-published report:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/odf-devel/odf_docs/ODF12-IMPLEMENTATION-DEFINED-PUBLIC.md
> >>>
> >>> After 1.2, I will push on to 1.3.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jim
> >>>   "This is an outrage!"
> >>>                         Tony Harrison
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> > --
> > Jim
> >    "This is an outrage!"
> >                          Tony Harrison
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to