Since the focus is on getting AOO5 out, we should assume that anything added to 
`trunk` is a candidate for backport to `AOO50X`.

If there are long-term, "experimental" work efforts, then we don't want to stop 
them, but, IMO at least, maybe they should be done in branches off of `trunk` 
and not folded _into_ trunk. One reason why work on 4.2.X stagnated was because 
of that exact reason: that trunk and AOO42X just diverged way, way too much.

Does that make sense?

--
Jim
  "Ow, chicka-chicka-ow-- OW! Man, my hat's on fire!"
                                - The Spirit of Jazz

Reply via email to