Simon Phipps wrote:
This is a little curious. As 'advised' here recently, I have been
investigating GCJ first hand, and I understood from talking to Mark
Weilaard (GNU/Classpath lead) that GCJ/GIJ was able to run OO.o 2
perfectly well now (thanks to lots of input from Red Hat), and that
Caolan McNamara has been doing excellent work to deliver just what RMS
is asking for. It seems to me that RMS is asking for what FSF people are
already doing. Am I missing something?
AFAIK, no. IMHO, everything seems to be OK and compliant with the
proposed Java policy
http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=jdk&msgNo=90
but I will see if I misunderstood anything.
S.
Kay
On 2005-05-09 12:51:03 +0100, "Kevin B. Hendricks"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this link. It seems the RMS
wants to fork OpenOffice.org due to its reliance on JDK.
Thoughts,
Kevin
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: [email protected]
From: Bruce Byfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 8, 2005 9:26:07 PM EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: FSF to fork OOo over java
See:
http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html
I'm planning to follow up on this news in an article for Newsforge. Does
anybody have any comments they would like to make?
I'll be checking this list tomorrow, but if people could cc me, I'd
appreciate it -- I have a lot of ground to cover on this story very
quickly.
Thanks,
--
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
