Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > Hi Laurent, > >> Hi Frank >> (tried hard not to put the c) > > :) you succeeded :) > >> are these helpers usefull to C++ addon developpers >> if no, you're right that the 'extension'/'addon'/'scripting' project is >> not the right place > > In parts. The ones from cppuhelper/salhelper are part of the SDK, but > probably also somewhat unknown. However, I think the majority of unknown > code is above the SDK, in comphelper/unotools/tools/svtools. Parts of > those might, as Jürgen said, be moved into the SDK if they're considered > usefull and finalized.
Especially comphelper and ucbhelper classes are good candidates for moving them to the SDK because they don't use any "tools/vcl" based code, usually they use only sdk libraries by themselves. Good examples: MediaDescriptor and EmbeddedObjectContainer in comphelper. A (maybe unwanted) side effect of moving libraries to the SDK is that you must be more careful when you change them. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
