Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Malte,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 13:00:24 +0100, Malte Timmermann wrote:
When we are done with warnings01, we should have most warnings in the
default warning level. People don't have to use wall=tr anymore, so this
one could be a candidate for some extra warning in wall=tr....
+1
Eike
+-0,
as the past has shown that any such mechanism that is not actively
maintained over time becomes unusable through too much noise (see
assertions; the current, pre-warnings01 wall=1; maybe also memory leaks
at program termination time).
-Stephan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
