Hi Jens-Heiner, thank you for your detailed answer.
> [...] > > We (that is the OOo developers) do our best to keep > everything working but things will break sometimes. Well, that's ok for a bleeding edge cvs checkout, but I didn't expect that for either 2.0.1 sources or an older milestone. > Looking back at your original post it seems that you > didn't build module 'epm' and you seem to miss the > module 'unodevtools' completely. That's right and I don't know why. I looked for an directory of that name but didn't find one. > 'epm' is the packager, so it's no wonder you didn't > get any packages. Indeed I had disabled the epm. It was because I, as I wrote, don't want/need to supply others with my build or even install OOo in other directories. But from what you wrote it is a must to build packages. Is that true? > On the other hand, asking how it could be that the > maintainer create such a fragile product might not > lead to someone of the maintainers lending a > helpful hand ... While you're right that accuse others mostly don't create helpful responses, isn't it quite ironic, it helped this this though it wasn't the intention of my second post? BTW: Various documents and http://download.openoffice.org mention a possibility to download the Solver/Output Tree. While I fear there won't be one in either tarball or CVS for FreeBSD, I even can't finde one for Linux or Windows. Flaw in the pages or in the data? Johannes ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
