Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Stephan Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(snip)
I guess it is largely unrealistic to have every community CWS built on the four mentioned platforms - unless we (Sun) do it ourselves (me thinks that especially wntmsci10 will pose problems). Thus it's maybe a bit moot to think about requesting self-contained OOo builds on top of that (if we do it ourselves, it's for free anyway). But what about providing tinderbox slaves, dedicated to community CWS?
What about asking the community for these builds? We have currently a few volunteer tinderbox clients running, see <http://go-ooo.org/tinderbox/all_trees.express.html>. Those are mainly building master milestones because we don't know if there is need for special CWSs to be verified. We could certainly need more tinderbox clients, and sure enough we could need some framework to request tinderbox builds, but what we have is a good start. See here for some hints how to setup a tinderbox: <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Tinderbox_Setup>. (It's on the wiki, improvements are very welcome.) I would also love to see that master milestones would only be declared ready by Hamburg RE if a few successfull community builds are reported, but that is a different story. Volker -- If you like my work consider: http://www.scytek.de/donations.html PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D
