Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Apart from that, with the integration of the UNO threading framework,
there's opportunity to bin thread-safe implementations at tons of
places, isn't there?
Yes and no, with the introduction of the UNO threading framework (see
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno/Effort/Creating_the_Uno_Threading_Framework
respectively
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Effort/Multi_Threading_Clean_up
for details), we basically can get rid of many interlock usages.
Unfortunately, many of these in-/decrements are generated on behalf of
the rtl strings, which are not yet planned to be replaced with a thread
unsafe version (despite the fact that this is certainly possible).
Note: With CWS perform07 we (Malte and I) fixed the unnecessary
refcounting of empty rtl and tools strings, this might relax the
situation a little bit.
Cheers,
Kay
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
