Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 17:36 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
> Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
> > Rene,
> > 
> > Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >>>>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37034
> >>>>> So, obviously the Dev.Guide is non-free. I wouldn't say that OOo is 
> >>>>> non-free because of this. In this sense, Debian can obviously 
> >>>>> redistribute the OOo SDK without the Dev.Guide only.
> >>>> That's what we do now but it still means repackaging the source since
> >>> What needs to be done to simplify this process?
> >>
> >> That this stuff is free so I don't need to remove it? :)
> > ->Frank Peters, Juergen Schmidt: Could you please comment on any license 
> > plans regarding the Dev.Guide?
> 
> we are currently evaluating if we can open source the guide. But i would 
> say the guide is free, because it is free available, people can extend 

Wrong.

> or correct the content and Sun is only maintaining the guide because a 

Wrong.

Read your own license statement again.

"This document is distributed under licenses restricting its use. You may
make copies of and redistribute it, but you may not modify or make derivative
works of this documentation without prior written authorization of Sun and its
licensors, if any.

Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystens, Inc."

-> no allowance to modify and redistribute modified works -> not free

Regards,

Rene

-- 
René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- Debian OOo Maintainer-Team
http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openoffice.debian.net | [email protected]
GPG: 248AEB73 | Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to