Hi Mathias,
So, while broadly agreeing with most of what you say:
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 08:53 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Without the spec the QA wouldn't be able to even find bugs in
> many cases (with the exception of obvious ones).
We hear this a lot. And, now we know that specifications are frequently
inaccurate, buggy / out of sync with the code anyway. So - I'm having
problems understanding what -exactly- QA need here. It'd help to have 10
representative examples of times when a specification has actually
helped distinguish between bugs & features, and what was done with that
information [ writing tests / whatever ].
Perhaps with some good examples to analyse here, it'd be easier to
understand some of the rational.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
