Utomo wrote:
I am waiting and open for suggestions.
Is there somebody can help me to determine how is the performance
improvements measured ?
Utomo
I have a few comments:
Performance should be quantified and explained by the submitter. In
other words, the submitter should indicate how to test and demonstrate a
speed improvement.
Memory and runtime both sounds like improvements to me.
Broader impact should carry more weight. For example, a 100% improvement
in sort speed is probably not as important as a 10% improvement in
screen redraw time because the screen is almost always updated. By the
same token, a 10% improvement in screen redraw may also beat a 20%
improvement in macro run-time.
I would probably use imprecise statements as those, and then after some
prioritizing, leave the final decision to public voting if it is not
obvious as to the final winner, or simply decide up front, that public
voting will be done.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
