Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> I think if Rüdigers' concerns were still valid they would be a clear >> sign that the separation between the URE and OOo is not really done and >> that there are still too much dependencies. OTOH if both indeed are >> separated enough the necessary changes in the build environment >> shouldn't make problems. Why should anybody have one CWS that contains >> sources from OOO *and* URE then? > > Maybe because you are adding something generally useful to sal and want > to use it in svx, say? (See the salstrintern CWS for such an example.)
Of course I know that people working on OOo code sometimes want to make changes in e.g. sal. And if this happens really that often it could create some pain. But if not it should be bearable to do this in two steps if(!) we otherwise see it as beneficial to separate the build. But if I wouldn't be surprised if our brave release engineers found a way to seperate the builds of OOo and URE that still allows to have both products in one CWS. :-) Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
