Martin Hollmichel schrieb:
> Nikolai talked some weeks ago about how helpful code reviews are
> (http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/code_reviews).
> [...]
> here:http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=222 or if people knows about other
> cool tools for doing reviews ?
Thank's, Martin, for bringing this up again.
In Hamburg we do such
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Code_Reviews#Example:_Leightweight_Code_Reviews_within_OOo)
reviews for more than three month now, and there occurred a few effects
I like especially:
- the Coding Standards
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Cpp_Coding_Standards) get
really fast "into the fingers", because we get in contact with them each
week,
- there appeared to be several things to be learned from the
co-developers, regarding as well their programming skills in general, as
their problem domain specifically,
- I get to know parts of the Office code, I never saw before, which
helps my understanding of the project as a whole.
After the current experience we would highly encourage any developer in
the OOo-community to try out such reviews, and even to make them a
regular habit.
Inspired by Joerg Jahnkes great page about regression tests
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Steps_towards_regular_automated_regression_testing),
I set up a wiki page
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Steps_towards_regular_code_reviews
to focus the activities towards code reviews.
Questions may best be discussed here on [email protected], Thorsten
Behrens (thb AT openoffice org) and me (np AT openoffice org) will try
to help.
Nikolai
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
