On Friday 08 February 2008, Oliver Braun wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > The planned new (OOo 3.0) structures are as follows: > > > > On Unix (Linux, Solaris): > > - The URE product still by default will install to > > /opt/openoffice.org/ure (but only the /opt prefix is relocatable). > > - The OOo product by default will install its three layers into > > -- /opt/openoffice.org/ure > > -- /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 > > -- /opt/openoffice.org3.0 > > (where only the /opt prefix is relocatable). > > - The StarOffice product, for example, by default will install its three > > layers into > > -- /opt/openoffice.org/ure > > -- /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 > > -- /opt/staroffice9 > > (where only the /opt prefix is relocatable). > > Is there a good reason to keep the minor (3.0) in the path names and thus > to continue to lose (super-)user deployed dictionaries and UNO extensions > when upgrading from e.g. 3.0 to 3.1 ?
I think that the best solution would be to get rid of share/dict/ooo and look for the dictionaries into a common place, for example /usr/share/myspell. It would be nice get rid of share/dict/ooo/dictionary.lst. The dictionaries have well defined names. It is possible to create symlinks for compatible languages, ... Well, there might be problems with symlinks on Windows but it would be very useful on Linux. -- Best Regards, Petr Mladek software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 952 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
