On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 16:50 +0900, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: > I have just updated the script, attached in an issue 101719. > http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/62128/create_submission_gateway_2-2009-05-10.pl > > Caolán, > Could you give it a try and revise it accordingly?
Err, "wmsfontextract" ?, presumably should be msfontextract, and there's a load of entries in there that don't really need to be in there that just clutter things up, e.g. glow never released any actual *code* as far as I know to submit a patch against and so on. So I wouldn't just put in every entry that ever existed in the CVSROOT/modules into that submission page, but instead only the dirs that exist at the moment in svn (and, for the moment at least, leave in the ones that were already listed but have gone away since then). i.e. I added the ones that are missing from a current svn checkout into the list earlier, so from my perspective http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html has all the links we currently need, no ? > Who should maintain the data included in the script? > Developers themselves? Ideally I guess the developers who maintain/don't actually maintain a given module would update it themselves as owner there. > Just look for sal. sb is currently assigned. > > [Module] > crashrep porting > sal porting sb > boot porting I made that speculative change earlier on a "gaining forgiveness is easier than gaining permission" basis. C. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
