Hi Kirill, I will not have the time to take action on these issues myself, but I would like to briefly summarize how you (and of course others) can get heard by the OASIS ODF TC.
For each standards TC, OASIS is offering a public comment list and they have a policy, that each comment submitted must be tracked. I am a member of the ODF TC for only six month now, but so far the process seems to work, hence I can recommend using the list. As there are some policies to consider, please have a look at [1] to learn about it and also find the information for subscribing to the mailing list there. Your comment to the ODF list can be just like the original mail, but I would recommend to add some information like name, contact, application (e.g. text, spreadsheet or presentation), category (formatting in your case) and a brief use case. If you or anyone else would like to invest more time, you might consider to submit a complete proposal. A proposal template you can find at [2], examples are available at [3]. Please refer the ODF TC wiki for more information [4]. Best regards, Peter [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=office [2] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ProposalTemplate [3] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/List_of_Proposals [4] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office Kirill S. Palagin wrote: > Hello everybody. > > We have highly desired issues > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5560 and > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8275 , which require > amendments for ODF specification. Issue 5560 is even implemented in > code. > So could somebody, who is member of OASIS ODF committee, introduce these > two proposals for next version of ODF? > > TIA. > WBR, > KP. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
